Role Model?
Source: PIG News Wire [01/31/14]

Justin Bieber is the icon/role model for a life without consequences.

Insulated from Objective Reality by his celebrity status, Bieber can do any damn thing he wants, because there are never adverse consequences, no matter what he does.

Insulated from Objective Reality by their victim status, Obamunists can do almost any damn thing they want, because there are rarely adverse consequences, no matter what they do.

Shielded from adverse consequences by a phalanx of imposing pay for play security guards, Bieber can piss on (literally and/or figuratively) anyone he meets and never have to pay the piper.

Shielded from adverse consequences by the intimidating might of the all powerful Nanny State, Obamunists can piss on any unhyphenated rogue individual they meet and never have to pay the piper.

Since their lives are devoid of adverse consequences too, it's no accident that government schooled idiots with self-esteem are the lion's share of Bieber's fans.

Justin Bieber isn't the 'cause' of this life without accountability. He's a prime example of the life without consequences effect.

Troubling Stuff
Source: Hambo's Hammer [01/16/14]

I listened to a babbling VRWC boom box wench yammer about the latest round of bullshit from that obnoxious little turd Justin Bieber. This time, this twerp egged his neighbor's house, because he has nothing better to do. This wench seems willing to shrug it off, but her rant reeks of Class Warfare and a willingness to coddle the twerp.

Egging isn't a big deal - she's right about that - but in this case it's pricey, because the house is covered with Venetian Plaster. It will cost $50,000 to re-plaster the front of the house with that Venetian Plaster.

The right wing wench has no sympathy for the recipient of those Bieber eggs, because the recipient is rich, so he, she, heshe, or it 'can afford it'. She comes much too close to opining that the homeowner targeted by those Bieber eggs 'had it coming' for being rich. That reeks of the Libertards' 'class envy' bullshit.

The right wing wench misses the key point, completely. Justin Bieber is an obnoxious little shit who believes that the rules everyone else lives by, don't apply to him. His is a life without adverse consequences, because he is never held accountable for his actions. She seems okay with that.

I thought personal accountability was one of conservatism's core tenets. Is there some top secret list which contains those individuals who aren't bound by personal accountability?

Since I'm a regular listener of this VRWC wench's show, I can attest to her solidly conservative credentials. After today, I'm compelled to wonder what changed.

Has conservatism 'evolved' to exclude Justin Bieber from taking responsibility for his actions, or has this boom box wench drifted to the left?

Has conservatism evolved to disqualify 'the rich' from being crime victims, because they have it coming, or has this boom box wench drifted to the left?

No matter what evolved, it's not thrilling me spitless.

Stuff Some Americans - I Mean YOU, Whitey - Won't Do
Source: Hambo's Hammer [01/10/14]

[A couple years ago, I sounded the alarm on the shocking disparity between Graybar Demographics and U.S. Census data. I sounded the call to arms, but nobody listened. It wounded me deeply, but I'm not willing to back down from a challenge.

Now, we're hearing nearly identical arguments coming from such noteworthy Ethnocrats as Attorney General Eric Holder, but this time, the knickers knotting isn't over graybar demographics. This time, the Ethnocrats are setting their hair on fire over TA DA Zero Tolerance 'offender' demographics. Thus sayeth Eric: "Too many of MY PEOPLE are being suspended and/or expelled over Zero Tolerance infractions."

Lance in hand, Hambo Quixote, will, once again, tilt the infamous demographics windmill. Why? Because I can, and because, the Ethnocrats insist, this idea offers the young 'uns an early, action packed, start along a new career path in troublemaking. Among other things, it will give them a chance to do something "for the good of society as a whole".

On your mark. Get set. Go forth and perpetrate, newby ZTZ offender Sparky.]

Enough is enough! If I hear one more lefty pinhead blithering about America's egregiously unfair Zero Tolerance rule breaker demographics, I'm gonna go postal. The usual suspects whine always starts the same way: there are, quite simply, too many properly-hyphenated individuals being 'victimized' by Zero Tolerance Zombies in American cess-schools. By a wide margin, the Melanin-Enriched are horrendously over-represented, when it comes to being suspended or expelled for a Zero Tolerance infraction, the whiners thunder. To shut them up, albeit temporarily, PIG will play this silly game and stipulate that this Zero Tolerance offender disparity is, as so many 'activists' proclaim, an intolerable situation that must be resolved, immediately.

Channeling my legendary sensitivity, I am trying my best to be shocked, shocked I tell you, over this blatant ZTZ enforcement racism. Fearlessly pursuing my ultimate goal, to shut these whiners up, I will see if there are any terminally PIGish ways to 'get 'er done' on this shocking outburst of flagrant discrimination.

The good news here is that properly-hyphenated cess-school inmates are doing their part, and then some. The bad news is that, as usual, whitey isn't doing his fair share of rule breaking. The problem, in my PIGish view, isn't the fact that too many blacks, Latinos and Asians are racking up Zero Tolerance infractions. The problem is, as usual, that whitey is refusing to do his duty to his country: whitey isn't chalking up enough suspension or expulsion qualifying ZTZ offenses.

I am up to here with all the hand-wringing these lefties are doing over this bullshit...Hand-wringing is for sissies. I spit on this lefty hand-wringing. I demand that these nitwits stop this whining and get 'proactive' about whitey's shocking under-representation in our 'hit the road rule breaking Jack' student population. If this is such a big damn problem then let's fix it. Resolving our ZTZ perp population's shocking deviation from that Holy Grail of "fairness", U.S. Census data, isn't brain surgery. In fact, I can think of four steps that can be taken immediately, to restore ZTZ offender demographics fairness and make these whining, activist pinheads shut the hell up:

1) Educrats, at all levels, should be banned from citing properly-hyphenated individuals, especially Melanin-Enriched inmates, who differently obey a cess-school's rules of engagement. This ban must stay in force until the appropriate, census-driven ZTZ offender demographics are restored. This point is not negotiable.

2) Public service campaigns should be mounted, from sea to shining sea, to encourage oppressors to do their patriotic duty by committing - and confessing to - their fair share of America's Zero Tolerance rule breaking.

3) Uncle Sam must organize, finance and staff a special task force to guide young oppressors onto a ZeroTolerance offender path. Since so many whites don't have proper rule breaking role models, it might be necessary to 'draft' certain young oppressors and send them to one of those special school hell holes, where every inmate is a career troublemaker, for 6 months to a year. This allows them to learn their new trade from the experts then serve as role models for their friends when they return to thier regular school.

4) Properly-hyphenated individuals with a long track record of ZTZ expulsions should be enlisted for a "ZTZ Offender Mentor" program that would pair them up with rule obeying oppressor young 'uns. Each oppressor ZTZ offender trainee would be 'guided' through some starter infractions by their ZTZ Offender Mentor, allowing them to bag some hands-on training in becoming a 'known cess-school problem student. Since the "ZTZ Offender Mentor" has been nabbed, multiple times, it's a slam dunk that their offender trainee will get caught, allowing the trainee to graduate and help restore 'fairness' to ZTZ offender demographics.

I know what you're thinking PIGsters, and I appreciate your enthusiasm for this worthy, equality of results quest. But, it might not be the right time to yank Percy and Peaches out of that advance placement program and start using that tuition money to hire a pro as your whitey offspring's "ZTZ Offender Mentor". According to PIG's top secret study, there are plenty of oppressors who are thisclose to expulsion for a ZTZ infraction. The problem is that they're stuck in a rut doing petty class disruptions with silly things like the dread 'finger gun'. Before you start Percy and Peaches on the road to a expulsion, look up that sorry ass punk they called a friend - the one who makes you so miserable. He, she, heshe or it is the one who needs a rational adult to put him on the road to a politically-correct Zero Tolerance 'felony', in the name of proper cess-school troublemaker diversity. Go ahead and imagine the punk languishing in mom's basement...It's even okey dokey to laugh out loud. I promise not to tell anybody.

Are we all on the same page now, ZTZ offender fairness Sparky?

Deja Vu
Source: PIG News Wire [01/04/14]

I found this Walter E. Williams prose eerily familiar.

Here's a question that I've asked in the past that needs to be revisited. Unless one wishes to obfuscate, it has a simple yes or no answer. If one group of people prefers strong government control and management of people's lives while another group prefers liberty and desires to be left alone, should they be required to enter into conflict with one another and risk bloodshed and loss of life in order to impose their preferences on the other group? Yes or no. My answer is no; they should be able to peaceably part company and go their separate ways.

The problem our nation faces is very much like a marriage in which one partner has an established pattern of ignoring and breaking the marital vows. Moreover, the offending partner has no intention to mend his ways. Of course, the marriage can remain intact while one party tries to impose his will on the other and engages in the deviousness of one-upsmanship and retaliation. Rather than domination or submission by one party, or domestic violence, a more peaceable alternative is separation.

I believe our nation is at a point where there are enough irreconcilable differences between those Americans who want to control other Americans and those Americans who want to be left alone that separation is the only peaceable alternative.

< BIG SNIP>

Americans have several options. We can like sheep submit to those who have contempt for liberty and our Constitution. We can resist, fight and risk bloodshed and death in an attempt to force America's tyrants to respect our liberties and Constitution. A superior alternative is to find a way to peaceably separate into states whose citizens respect liberty and the Constitution. My personal preference is a restoration of the constitutional values of limited government that made us a great nation. ['Parting Company' on Town Hall site]

At least a year ago, I arrived at a similar conclusion:

Irreconcilable Differences

If America's political system is like a marriage, we seem headed for a bitterly contested divorce. The two sides only share one thing, an unrelenting hostility for each other. For the purposes of this rant, I'll call these warring parties Obamunists and Sovereign Individuals.

To show how far apart the two sides have drifted, here are a few bones of contention:

Item 1:
Sovereign Individuals believe that the primary purpose of government is to create an environment which maximizes individual liberty. Sovereign individuals call this 'an equality of opportunity'.

Obamunists believe that the primary purpose of government is to impose an equality of results through the coercive power of the Nanny State.

Item 2:
Sovereign Individuals believe in the U.S. Constitution, as the Founding Fathers intended it: a document which sets strict, non-negotiable limits on the Nanny State, by clearly delineating the government's limited powers.

Obamunists view the U.S. Constitution as an archaic relic of America's ignoble, white racist past which needs to be abolished, to unleash the full, coercive power of the Nanny State.

Item 3:
Sovereign Individuals, as their name implies, believe that the basic unit of American political life is the individual. America is/was created to maximize INDIVIDUAL liberty. Under this philosophy, all individuals are, in the eyes of the government, created equal.

Obamunists believe that the basic unit of American political life is the group. Under their scheme, the Nanny State pigeonholes Americans using immutable traits and/or lifestyle choices. Under this Orwellian scheme, some - depending on how the Nanny State ranks a given group - are more equal than others.

Item 4:
Sovereign Individuals believe that wealth is dynamic and is only limited by the intelligence and hard work put in by sovereign individuals who strive to maximize their potential.

Obamunists believe that wealth is a static commodity which must be controlled, redistributed, by the Nanny State.

Item 5:
Sovereign Individuals believe that each individual is, must be, accountable for his, her, hisher, or its own actions.

Obamunists are convinced that dark forces - racists, capitalist, sexists, homophobes - are constantly conspiring against them.

Item 6:
Sovereign Individuals believe that they, and they alone, are the best, the only, ones who have the right, the power, to decide how to conduct their own life and dispense with their own property.

Obamunists know how pathetic they are and have convinced themselves that they're too stupid, too inept to conduct their own life. Since misery loves company, they insist that the Nanny State run everyone's life, including those smartass Sovereign Individuals.

I could continue, but you get the idea.

The good news is that, if Sovereign Individuals prevail, the worst that will happen is that Obamunists will lose their bogus, group-specific, rights and will be forced to fend for themselves as GASP individuals.

The bad news is that Obamunists greatly outnumber the Sovereign Individual and are using Nanny State coercion to, systematically, strip Sovereign Individuals of their inalienable individual liberty birthright.

This Sovereign Individual thinks it's time for a political divorce, a nasty process which must, necessarily, divide the community property - America. Sovereign Individuals would move to their portion of America and restore the kind of government, the bastion of individual liberty, that the Founding Fathers created. The Obamunists would be free to devour each other, when they discover that all the achievers live in the Sovereign Individual part of America.